Smallholders' use of bt-cotton under unfavourable context: lessons from south africa

Favoris & Partage
Export BibTex
Export PDF
Signaler

Actes de conférence de M. Fok and M. Gouse and J. Hofs - 2008

Lien externe ou de téléchargement

  • Référence bibliographique
  • Année de publication
  • 2008
  • Auteur(s)
  • M. Fok and M. Gouse and J. Hofs
  • Titre du document
  • Smallholders' use of bt-cotton under unfavourable context: lessons from south africa
  • Titre en anglais
  • Smallholders' use of bt-cotton under unfavourable context: lessons from south africa
  • Adresse email de l'auteur
  • michel.fok@cirad.fr
  • Adresse URL
  • http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/index.php?action_todo=search&view_this_doc=halshs-00324376&version=1&halsid=ab9786acfffd86ce6d325a67d121d5ed
  • Pays concerné(s)
  • Afrique du Sud
  • Thésaurus associé(s)
  • Colire
  • Mots-clé(s) Colire
  • Facteur biotechno des coûts de production
    Coût des semences GM
    Redevance technologique
    Conditions d'utilisation des semences GM
    Modalités de la réforme
    Zonage du coton
    Monopole
    Modalités de coordination privée
    Exécution de la coordination privée
    Partenariat public/privé
    Influence du secteur privé
    Secteur privé
  • Enregistré le
  • 2011-12-14
  • Modifié le
  • 2011-12-14
  • Administré par
  • Fok Michel
  • Résumé
  • The bulk of the South African cotton crop is produced by large scale commercial farmers. Therefore it might be misleading to present South Africa’s impressive Genetically Modified Cotton (GMC) adoption figures as evidence of successful GMC use by smallholder farmers. The total South African cotton area and number of farmers decreased drastically since the introduction of GMC and this causes observers to question the so-called success story of GMC in South Africa. Nevertheless, the smallholders' ...
  • Résumé en anglais
  • The bulk of the South African cotton crop is produced by large scale commercial farmers. Therefore it might be misleading to present South Africa’s impressive Genetically Modified Cotton (GMC) adoption figures as evidence of successful GMC use by smallholder farmers. The total South African cotton area and number of farmers decreased drastically since the introduction of GMC and this causes observers to question the so-called success story of GMC in South Africa. Nevertheless, the smallholders' commitment in using Bt-cotton has been real and still is. Several assessment studies have demonstrated how profitable the adoption of Bt-cotton could be, but they did not take into account the local context of agriculture. The study we have implemented during the 2002/03 cropping season took place in a year of erratic rainfalls and when the institutional framework of cotton production has furthermore evolved negatively. Our study hence provides additional information on the adoption of Bt-cotton when context turns to become unfavourable. In this case, the mere access to cotton production is restrained to a limited number of producers; the cotton production becomes financially more risky while the profitability of using Bt-cotton is nullified. The South African cotton sector struggles in an unstable production and market environment and smallholders, with limited resources and limited production, managerial and marketing capacity and choice, suffer most. Technology introduction on its own cannot sustainably increase production; factors like institutional arrangements play a vital role. This reminds us that rain-fed agriculture remains sensitive to climatic hazards and that new technology adoption under these conditions might increase financial risk associated with cotton production.